04/09/2024 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 04/09/2024 16:03
This audio was created using Microsoft Azure Speech Services
As Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESSs) emerge as important tools in the evolving energy landscape, maximizing their benefits is crucial to assuring maximum return on investment. Like microgrids, an inverter-controlled BESS provides flexibility to consume or store energy when utility rates are lowest and use this stored power when rates increase, a practice known as energy arbitrage. A BESS can also be used as a backup power supply to improve resilience when utility power outages occur.
Engineers face a learning curve when deploying inverter-controlled power sources such as a BESS. While solar panels and BESSs can run in parallel with a utility feed to optimize energy costs, their inverters must shut down when a utility outage occurs. To power essential loads during a utility outage, a means of isolating an inverter-controlled power source from a utility source is required. Once isolated, an inverter can safely return to operation to power its essential loads. A basic form of microgrid controller can supervise these functions.
Because they are familiar with backup power applications, engineers may be inclined to design an isolation means using automatic transfer switches (ATS). A better solution for these isolation needs is a source isolation switch (SIS) that enhances both safety and on-site power resilience by disconnecting an inverter-controlled power source from a utility feed.
Drawbacks of Using ATS for Isolation
The intended purpose of an ATS is not to isolate a power source. Rather, an ATS detects when a grid outage occurs and signals a genset to start and then accept a load transfer. Consequently, ATS manufacturers design their products to connect to power continually, and ATS controllers use operating sequences that are inappropriate for isolation. As a result, engineers must assemble multiple devices to improvise a functional isolation solution. Those components include controllers, breakers, and metering devices to monitor the incoming power.
To deploy such systems, each component must be installed, connected, and tested to commission the backup power system. Although the transfer switches may be UL-listed, the standard to which they are listed may not have been created for devices that isolate a power source. UL 1008 Standard for Safety to which many transfer switches are listed addresses transferring loads between power sources, not source isolation. Using a listed switch to isolate a utility source is beyond the scope of UL 1008. Such switches also may not have been tested in the equipment combinations needed to achieve the type of isolation required by codes. Consequently, this approach adds cost, complexity, and uncertainty to the deployment process and can increase malfunction risk by adding potential failure points.
Simple Solution - A Source Isolation Switch
A simpler approach is to deploy an SIS. The one-line diagram below shows conceptual differences between an ATS and an SIS.
An SIS is a more sensible and cost-effective isolation solution for multiple reasons:
To learn more about power source management and using a BESS for backup power, download the new ASCO white paper SourcePacT Source Isolation Switch Basics. For further information, visit the SourcePacT webpage, email ASCO Customer Care, or contact a local ASCO representative.