Earnout Decision Underscores Buyer’s Post-Closing Obligations Are Very Limited Except as Specifically Set Forth in Parties’ Agreement — Fortis v. Medtronic

The M&A Lawyer republished an article based on a client memo coauthored by senior counsel Gail Weinstein and partners Steven Epstein, Philip Richter, Steven J. Steinman, Maxwell Yim, Shant P. Manoukian and Adam B. Cohen on the Delaware Court of Chancery's decision in Fortis v. Medtronic Minimed.

Click here to read the article.

This communication is for general information only. It is not intended, nor should it be relied upon, as legal advice. In some jurisdictions, this may be considered attorney advertising. Please refer to the firm's data policy page for further information.