Baker Donelson Celebrates the Historic Impact of the Obergefell Decision Diversity Matters Newsletter

While it was truly a privilege to hear Jim speak about his story firsthand, he raised concerns about the longevity of the decision, specifically referencing the precedent set in the Supreme Court's decision to overrule Roe v. Wade on June 24, 2022, in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization. This decision explicitly showed that at least one justice would like to see the Obergefell decision reconsidered. Specifically, Justice Clarence Thomas concludes that the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment does not provide for substantive due process such that rights like the right to marry are protected by it. While Justice Samuel Alito declined to undermine the substantive due process jurisprudence that underlies the Obergefell decision in his majority opinion, he previously dissented to the Obergefell decision and made similar arguments as Justice Thomas.

While the 2022 Respect for Marriage Act signed into law by President Joe Biden requires states to recognize same-sex marriages performed in other states, the decision to provide full marriage equality would return to the states if Obergefell was overturned. In such a legal landscape where states would be permitted to craft their own legislation and likely place bans on same-sex marriage, marriage equality would not be effectively enforceable nationwide. The protections afforded under the 2022 Respect for Marriage Act do provide a backstop of protections, though, as well as a starting place for necessary conversations for building out greater protections for marriage equality.

Walking away from the conversation with Jim, we saw that it is important to not only honor the sacrifices he and John made in the name of marriage equality but also to recognize that the fight for marriage equality is ongoing and still requires the considered input and energies of those who want to continue to maintain and further protect it.