Sky high

The Chicken Little predictions that the Federal Reserve easing cycle would lead to an exodus of assets from liquidity products have been proven wrong. Money market funds across the industry alone have experienced inflows of around $150 billion since the Fed cut rates by 50 basis points in mid-September to a range of 4.74-5%.

It's another case of the disconnect between some media pundits and investors. The former want their opinions heard, and bad news gets more attention. The latter simply want the highest possible return across their portfolio, whether they invest in liquidity products to offset riskier holdings or for future deployment in other investment opportunities.

Historically in a falling-rate environment, yields of cash management products lag the direct security market. Why? Because some of their holdings have locked in higher rates, and most of those won't mature for some time over the next 12 months-referred to as a laddered strategy. Securities, especially overnight securities and those with floating rates, trace the Fed's move immediately after the Fed lowers rates, as does the Reverse Repurchase Facility, which now sits at 4.80%. History is only a guide, of course, but we think this will be the case as the easing continues.

Some cynics channeling Henny Penny-the original name of that apocalyptic lad in the European folk tale-characterize the magnitude of rate reduction as a mortal blow. We think that actually helps cash-like vehicles because the decline in their yields traditionally has been proportional to the cut. Had the Fed dropped the target range by a quarter-point, liquidity yields likely would have a spread of around 12 basis points initially. As it stands, that difference is closer to 25 basis points with the oversized cut, and gets more attractive out the inverted yield curve. No wonder the inflows.

Strike that?

The Fed has tacitly declared victory over inflation, and the August PCE report supports that. Core PCE, which strips out volatile elements such as energy and food prices, rose only 0.1% from July against expectations for a 0.2% gain. But inflation might reverse course if the port workers across the Eastern seaboard go on strike. The Fed typically ignores exogenous events as being too temporary to warrant a monetary policy response. But the disruption to supply chains is not easily predictable. While it likely won't be as disruptive as the pandemic, it probably will be worse than the interference caused by the cargo ship stuck in the Suez Canal, terrorist attacks in the Red Sea and the tragedy in Baltimore combined. If a strike by longshoremen is prolonged, inflation could rise to the point the Fed could hold rates at one of the year's last meetings.

Doing just fine, thank you

The implementation of the SEC's money fund rules is finally upon us. On Oct. 2, we get the last phase, which imposes mandatory liquidity fees on institutional prime and institutional municipal money market funds. A fee would only be charged only if net redemptions exceed 5% of a fund's net assets and the cost of liquidity (including, transaction costs and market impact costs) exceeds .01% of the value of the total shares redeemed on that day. Despite our lasting opinion that the "reforms" were not necessary, it is good to finally close the chapter. The liquidity industry has risen to the occasion despite the operational challenges, and we believe the inflows this year shows that the efficacy of these products remains intact.

Central bank news

Policymakers of three other major central banks met in September. Sluggish growth across the eurozone and cooling inflation, which fell to 2.2% in August, may have encouraged the European Central Bank to cut its deposit rate by 25 basis points to 3.5% last month. It was its second reduction this year following its landmark cut in June. The Bank of England's Monetary Policy Committee voted to leave rates unchanged at 5%, after reducing rates by 25 basis points at its meeting in August. Lastly, the Bank of Japan did not raise rates last month, saying it wanted to take its time and monitor other countries. Although Governor Kazuo Ueda said Japan's economy is progressing well, he is concerned about the global picture: "The outlook for overseas economic development is highly uncertain. We need to scrutinize such developments carefully for the time being."