CEI - Competitive Enterprise Institute

30/07/2024 | News release | Distributed by Public on 30/07/2024 21:06

EU’s Digital Markets Act: An obstruction to AI innovation

Photo Credit: Getty

European consumers are being left behind in the AI revolution due to tightened regulations. Apple's decision to withhold its new AI features from the European market has sparked a debate about the influence of the EU's Digital Markets Act (DMA) on innovation and consumer access to cutting-edge technology.

The DMA regulates large digital platforms, referred to as gatekeepers, which include companies like Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, ByteDance, Meta, and Microsoft. It imposes several obligations on these companies, such as preventing self-preferencing, ensuring interoperability, and providing fair access to their platforms. The Act additionally imposes preemptive, or ex ante, regulatory obligations that depart from traditional ex post antitrust liability, when authorities investigate and penalize companies after a violation has occurred.

It is important to advocate for permissionless innovation, as this approach leads to fewer false positives and a more ex post approach to allow companies to innovate freely and address issues as they arise, rather than early restrictive creativity. Currently the DMA favors static competition over dynamic competition and precaution over innovation.

The consequences of the current regulatory approach are already becoming apparent. Apple recently reported that it would not roll out its latest AI innovation, Apple Intelligence and iPhone mirroring, in the European Union this year. Apple Intelligence, which integrates generative AI into devices like iPhones, iPads, and Macs, represents a significant leap forward in consumer AI technology, but the DMA will force European consumers to wait longer than their global counterparts to experience these advancements.

Apple's worries primarily revolve around the DMA's interoperability requirements. The company fears that these requirements could potentially compromise user privacy and data security. This hesitation to launch new features in the EU market is already setting a precedent for other tech giants, widening the gap between European consumers and the rest of the world in terms of access to AI-powered technologies.

The implications of this regulatory obstacle extend beyond just Apple. Meta, for instance, has expressed doubts about releasing the latest version of LLaMA, its advanced AI language model similar to ChatGPT, in the EU. Alphabet is also under scrutiny for potential DMA violations. This increased regulatory pressure discourages these companies from prioritizing the European market for their most innovative AI features.

The consequence of this technological lag is far-reaching. As AI becomes increasingly integrated into everyday products and services, European consumers will find themselves at a disadvantage. From enhanced productivity tools to more personalized user experiences, the benefits of AI in consumer technology are numerous and growing. By delaying or preventing the implementation of these features, the DMA inadvertently hampers European users' ability to fully participate in the global digital economy.

Moreover, this situation will have long-term effects on Europe's competitiveness in the tech sector. If major tech companies consistently delay or withhold their most advanced features from the European market, it will discourage local innovation and investment in AI technologies. This will lead to a brain drain, with talented developers and entrepreneurs seeking opportunities in more AI-friendly markets.

It is crucial for European policymakers to reassess the influence of the DMA on technological innovation and consumer access to advanced features. The current situation with Apple and Microsoft withholding AI features from the European market due to regulatory concerns is a wake-up call.

The EU's approach to regulating big tech is too heavy-handed, suffocating the dynamic of the market and restricting opportunities for experimentation and creative freedom. Instead of fostering innovation and protecting consumers, it risks creating a technological divide between Europe and the rest of the world.

The Washington Times

KOSA is a poor substitute for parenting

Good parenting was always a lot of work, but guarding kids' online mental health has added to the parental load. Not every problem has a…

Tech and Telecom

Blog

Could AI regulation hamper the next agricultural revolution?

Artificial intelligence (AI) is poised to revolutionize the agricultural industry, along with other sectors of the economy. Already, AI has reduced…

Innovation

News Release

Supreme Court decision on state social media laws portends free speech victories

Today, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Moody v. NetChoice & CCIA and NetChoice & CCIA v. Paxton, two related cases reviewing state…

Media, Speech and Internet Freedoms