State of Idaho Office of the Attorney General

07/19/2024 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 07/19/2024 15:08

Attorney General Labrador Joins 22 State Brief Supporting Florida Law Regulating Sex Modification Procedures for Minors

HomeNewsroomAttorney General Labrador Joins 22-State Brief Supporting Florida Law Regulating Sex-Modification Procedures for Minors

[BOISE] - Attorney General Raúl Labrador today joined a 22-state amicus brief in support of Florida's request to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals to allow the state to enforce its law regulating sex-modification procedures while the district court's order enjoining the law is heard on appeal. The case is Doe v. Surgeon General, State of Florida.

Like half the states in the country and many European nations, Florida puts age limits on sex-change procedures, prohibiting the administration of puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgeries to minors for the purpose of gender transition. In June, a federal district court permanently enjoined enforcement of the law, holding that Florida's legislature acted out of animus against transgender individuals in passing the law.

"Idaho is no stranger to the federal government intruding on state sovereignty when it comes to laws protecting minors from experimental, medically unsupported, and increasingly repudiated gender transition procedures," said Attorney General Labrador. "We are pleased to join Florida's similar efforts to protect their kids from harm and I hope our experience can support their case."

In their brief filed today, the state coalition argued that the Florida district court failed to apply the required presumption of legislative good faith to Florida's law and instead applied the presumption in favor of organizations like the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH), which advocates for providing minors identifying as transgender with hormonal and surgical interventions. The brief highlighted recently unsealed evidence in Alabama's case revealing that WPATH's recommendations were created in collaboration with "social justice lawyers" who told the group to not even look for evidence because doing so would reveal a lack of evidence and hurt their chances of "affecting policy" and "winning lawsuits."

The Alabama-led brief included attorneys general from the states of: Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, and West Virginia.