07/19/2024 | News release | Distributed by Public on 07/19/2024 08:24
Our recent global webinar explored how businesses should respond to pay transparency legislation and trends in the UK, Europe and the US. In conversation with Elouisa Crichton (Partner in the UK Employment team), Davide Boffi (Partner and Europe Head of Employment and Labour) and Brian Baggott (Partner in our Kansas City office), we discussed current frameworks and upcoming legal developments relating to pay transparency, and best practices to identify and mitigate related risks within your business.
Pay equity means the non-discriminatory principle of receiving equal pay for equal work, whereas pay transparency focuses on the practice of being open and sharing information about pay. Of course, whilst the two are intrinsically linked, the principles are fundamentally different and, if employers have concerns or issues in relation to pay equity (i.e. discriminatory pay practices), the shift towards pay transparency could open them up to risk and litigation.
To prepare for the upcoming changes (especially in the EU), employers are encouraged to take advice as to whether they should assess their current pay structure, conduct an equal pay analysis and/or remedy any risk areas. Strategies for analysing and understanding a company's pay structure could include conducting a comprehensive pay audit, consulting external resources such as market surveys and compensation consultants, and gathering internal feedback. Legal compliance and documentation are also crucial.
To determine whether and what action has to be taken, employers will need to:
If a problem is identified in the analysis, employers should be aware of the legal considerations and potential challenges. They should consider the impact on employees, the potential for litigation and the long-term implications of any changes to pay structures. Employers are advised to seek guidance on the appropriate steps for implementing pay adjustments, ensuring that any modifications comply with the usual processes for contractual changes, which may apply on both an individual and collective basis. Correcting pay practices going forward may shine a light on historic pay disparity.
Companies may wish to explore a global approach to pay transparency, aiming for consistency and uniformity in their practices. A global approach may mean different things to different companies. For example, it could mean full transparency about pay, other types of voluntary reporting or taking steps to introduce pay transparency, such as during the recruitment process. However, whilst there could be many benefits, such as talent acquisition and retention, and other administrative advantages, the implementation of a one-size-fits-all approach may come up against challenges due to the unique laws and regulations in different regions. Additionally, it may unnecessarily expose pay issues that exist within an organisation, creating reputational risk and potentially causing competition issues by providing key information to competitors in the market.
Whilst in the UK, subject to certain data protection restrictions, it would be lawful to voluntarily undertake pay transparency reporting, and some businesses may choose to do this ahead of any legal obligation (often to showcase their commitment to pay equity and diversity), it might not be desirable for the reasons detailed above. On the other hand, in the US, voluntarily implementing pay transparency reporting is likely to be difficult to put in place due to the patchwork of laws in different states. A uniform approach would be easiest in the EU. Indeed, the new 2023 Directive will align the legislation of individual EU member states and assist multinational companies as they will all be required to adopt a consistent approach within the EU. Any policy will need to comply with at least the minimum standards required by the Directive. Of course, considering this exercise will be easier once the Directive has been introduced in all member states and the requirements in the different jurisdictions can be compared with one another.
At this stage, given that different jurisdictions are at different junctures in their pay transparency journey, we would suggest that any global approach taken right now is limited to understanding pay within the organisation and, where appropriate, correcting any issues identified. Greater transparency can follow. By taking these preparatory steps now, it will be easier to be ahead of the curve when legislation starts to take effect.
If your business needs any advice on the legal requirements of pay equity and transparency, assistance with analysing current pay structures or finding that "sweet spot" in terms of a global approach that works for your organisation, please do not hesitate to reach out to Dentons.