Investigations; Determinations, Modifications, and Rulings, etc.: Certain Eye Cosmetics and Packaging Therefor

Certain Eye Cosmetics and Packaging Therefor; Notice of Institution of Investigation

Supplementary Information

Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2024).

Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on July 10, 2024, ordered that -

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine:

(a) whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(C) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain products identified in paragraph (2) by reason of infringement of the '655 mark, and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337; and

(b) Whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(A) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, or in the sale of certain products identified in paragraph (2) by reason of unfair competition or false advertising, the threat or effect of which is to destroy or substantially injure an industry in the United States;

(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the plain language description of the accused products or category of accused products, which defines the scope of the investigation, is "eye cosmetics, i.e., eye creams, eye palettes, eye kits, eye patches, eye serums and eye lashes";

(3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served:

(a) The complainant is: Amarte USA Holdings, Inc., 1731 California St., Redding, California 96001.

(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served:

Unilever PLC, Port Sunlight, Wirral, Merseyside CH62 4ZD, United Kingdom

Unilever United States, Inc., 800 Sylvan Avenue, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 07632

Carver Korea Co., Ltd., 81 Tojeong-ro 31-gil, Mapo-gu, Seoul (Daeheung-dong), South Korea

Bourne & Morgan Ltd., 71-75 Shelton Street, Covent Garden, London, United Kingdom, WC2H 9JQ

MZ Skin Ltd., 5 Elstree Gate, Elstree Way, Borehamwood, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom, WD61JD

Kaibeauty, 104 Nanjing W Rd., Zhongshan District, Taipei City, Taiwan 10491

I'll Global Co., Ltd., 3F, Samdeok Bldg., 315, Sinbanporro, Seocho-gu, Seoul, South Korea 06546

Hikari Laboratories Ltd., 207 Rishonim Street, Bnei Atarot 60991, Israel

Iman Cosmetics, P.O. Box 6867, London, Greater London, E14 5AN, United Kingdom; and, 363 7th Ave Suite 8, New York, NY 10001

Strip Lashed, 38 Main Street, Rawmarsh, Rotherham, South Yorkshire, S62 50W, United Kingdom

Kelz Beauty, Almassy Ter 11, 1077, Budapest, Hungary

(c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and

(4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge.

Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as amended in 85 FR 15798 (March 19, 2020), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the complainant of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown.

Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.