11/05/2024 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 11/05/2024 11:19
Early alignment and collaboration continue to drive project success with alternative delivery.
Progressive design-build is a delivery method in which a design-build team is selected based on its qualifications rather than price very early in the project. The procurement process is typically program-focused with RFP requirements centered around team culture, processes, and project approach. After selection, the owner works with this design-build team to gradually develop the design to an agreed-upon contract price at a set design milestone.
In contrast, traditional design-build delivery includes a builder and designer teaming in a design competition (typically up to a 100% schematic design) to meet the owner's program and design standards and provide a set price. Upon award, the design-build team is then at risk for completing the design and construction of the project for that project budget, without deviating from the owner's criteria or the submitted design. For these reasons, the selection process of a traditional design-build team is lengthier than progressive and limits the amount of owner engagement post award.
The progressive design-build approach offers a range of benefits that streamline the construction process and enhance project outcomes for the owner. This method fosters collaboration as the owner, designer and builder work closely together, aligning goals and improving communication throughout the entire process. In addition, the early involvement of the design-builder supports informed decision making throughout the project life cycle and allows the owner to continue adjusting their program and project requirements. The design and construction progress in conjunction with one another, resulting in greater flexibility, transparency, and budget alignment as the design evolves.
The solicitation process for progressive design-build begins with owners developing a request for qualifications/proposal (RFQ/RFP) suitable to procure a design-build team. The RFQ/RFP can be produced entirely by the owner or with the assistance of an executive architect, consultants, cost estimators, construction management professionals, and others. The RFQ/RFP can be single or multi-step submissions. If done separately, the RFQ is typically used to shortlist three potential design-builders.
Most RFPs are structured to select the design-build team primarily based on qualifications, such as depth of experience, past performance, project approach, safety record, and other qualitative factors important to the owner.
Proposals from the design-build teams typically include limited design concepts or none at all. The construction budget is also often omitted by the design-build team at this stage; however, a cost basis for preconstruction may be requested. Once chosen, the design-build team is then responsible for working with the owner in real-time to develop and execute both the design and construction phases.
The procurement of progressive design-build services typically involves a two phased approach.
During this phase, the design-builder partners with the owner through the design development. Stakeholders are engaged to validate the scope and baseline requirements toward a preliminary schedule and realistic budget. The deliverables from this phase often include completed design development drawings, design specifications, a narrative basis of design responding to the owner's project requirements, an updated schedule, and a project budget. The financial model by which cost commitment is achieved varies. Two common variations are Lump Sum and Guaranteed Maximum Price, each with unique considerations relative to owner involvement and associated risks.
Once a design is substantially or completely developed, the owner can choose to progress forward by:
It is important to recognize the owner must have reserved rights to the design in the original agreement to bid out the construction phase separately.
Once the contract terms are agreed upon, the project continues as a typical design-build project as it enters the construction phase. The design-build team, along with any potential trade partners who were onboarded early, utilize this time to complete the construction drawings aligning budget, scope and schedule.
Progressive design-build differs from other delivery methods in a variety of ways.
In summary, progressive design-build offers several advantages as a project delivery method. When considering if this delivery method would be appropriate for your next project consider these notable benefits:
These advantages make progressive design-build an attractive option for many construction projects, providing a balanced approach to cost, quality and schedule management.
About the Author
Megan Fairley is Director of Design Integration for McCarthy's Southern Pacific Region. With 12 years of experience in both field operations and design phase services, Megan has successfully contributed to several significant healthcare and collaborative delivery projects for clients such as UCLA Health, UCI Health, St. Jude Medical Center Fullerton, and Children's Hospital Orange County. Most recently, Megan has been instrumental in the UCLA Neuropsychiatric Replacement Hospital, a progressive design-build behavioral health in the Mid-Wilshire area of Los Angeles. Megan's contributions to the industry have earned her recognition as a "Woman of Influence in Architecture, Construction & Design" by the LA Business Journal in both 2022 and 2023. She is also a certified DBIA Professional, underscoring her commitment to excellence in design-build practices