whether to require investors in these instruments to accrue income over the term of their investment.It also asks for comments on a
number of related topics, includingthe character of income or loss with respect to these instruments; the relevance of factors such as
the nature of the underlying property to which the instruments are linked; the degree, if any, to which income (including any mandated
accruals) realized bynon-U.S. investorsshould be subject to withholding tax; and whether these instruments are or should be subject
to the "constructive ownership" regime, which very generallycanoperate to recharacterize certain long-term capital gain as ordinary
income and impose a notionalinterest charge. While the notice requestscomments onappropriate transition rules and effective dates,
any Treasury regulations or other guidancepromulgated after consideration of theseissues could materially and adversely affect the
taxconsequences of an investment in the notes, possibly with retroactive effect. You should consult your tax adviser regarding the
U.S. federal incometax consequences of an investment in the notes, including possiblealternative treatments and the issuespresented
by thisnotice.
Section 871(m) of the Code and Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder ("Section 871(m)") generally impose a 30% withholding
tax (unless an income tax treaty applies) on dividend equivalentspaid or deemedpaid to Non-U.S. Holders with respect to certain
financial instrumentslinked to U.S. equities or indices that include U.S. equities. Section 871(m) provides certain exceptions to this
withholding regime, including for instruments linked to certain broad-based indices that meet requirements set forth in theapplicable
Treasury regulations.Additionally, a recent IRS notice excludes fromthe scopeof Section 871(m) instruments issued prior to January
1, 2027 that do not have a delta of one with respect to underlying securities that could pay U.S.-source dividendsfor U.S. federal
income taxpurposes (each an "Underlying Security"). Based on certain determinations made by us, our special taxcounsel isof the
opinion that Section 871(m) shouldnot apply to the notes with regard to Non-U.S. Holders.Our determination is not binding on the
IRS, and the IRS may disagree with this determination.Section 871(m) is complex and itsapplication may depend on your particular
circumstances, including whether you enter into other transactions with respect to an Underlying Security. You should consult your tax
adviser regarding the potential application of Section 871(m) to the notes.
The Estimated Value of the Notes
The estimated value of the notes set forth on the cover of this pricing supplement is equal to thesum of the values of the following
hypothetical components: (1) a fixed-income debt component withthe same maturityasthe notes, valued using the internal funding
rate described below, and (2) the derivative or derivatives underlying the economic terms of the notes. The estimated valueof the
notes does not represent a minimum price at which JPMS wouldbe willing to buy your notes in any secondarymarket (if anyexists) at
any time. The internalfunding rate used in thedetermination of the estimated value of the notes may differ from the market-implied
fundingrate for vanilla fixed income instrumentsof a similar maturityissued by JPMorgan Chase & Co. or its affiliates. Any difference
maybe based on, among other things, our and our affiliates'view of thefunding value of the notes as well as the higher issuance,
operational and ongoingliability management costs of the notes in comparisonto those costs for the conventional fixed income
instrumentsof JPMorgan Chase & Co. This internal funding rate is based on certain market inputs and assumptions, which may prove
to be incorrect, and is intended to approximatethe prevailing market replacement fundingrate for the notes. Theuse of an internal
fundingrate and any potential changes to that ratemay have an adverse effect on the terms of the notes and anysecondary market
prices of the notes. For additionalinformation, see "Selected Risk Considerations-Risks Relating to the Estimated Value and
Secondary Market Prices of the Notes- The Estimated Value of the NotesIs Derived by Reference to anInternal FundingRate" in this
pricing supplement.
The value of the derivativeor derivativesunderlying the economic terms of thenotes is derived from internal pricingmodelsof our
affiliates. These models are dependent on inputssuch as the traded market prices of comparable derivative instruments and on
various other inputs, someof which are market-observable, and which can include volatility, dividend rates, interest rates and other
factors, as well as assumptions about futuremarket events and/or environments. Accordingly, the estimated value of the notes is
determined when the terms of the notes areset based on market conditions and other relevant factors and assumptions existing at that
time.
The estimated value of the notes doesnot represent future values of thenotes and may differ from others' estimates. Different pricing
modelsand assumptionscould provide valuations for the notes that are greater than or less than the estimated value of the notes.In
addition, market conditions and other relevant factors in the futuremay change, and any assumptions may prove to be incorrect. On
future dates, thevalue of the notescouldchange significantly based on, among other things, changes in market conditions, our or
JPMorgan Chase & Co.'screditworthiness, interest ratemovements and other relevant factors, which may impact the price, if any, at
whichJPMS would be willing to buy notes fromyou in secondarymarket transactions.
The estimated value of the notes is lower than the originalissue price of the notes because costs associated with selling, structuring
and hedging the notes are includedin the original issue price of the notes. These costsinclude the selling commissions paid to JPMS
and other affiliated or unaffiliated dealers, the projected profits, if any, that our affiliates expect to realize for assuming risks inherent in
hedging our obligations under the notes and the estimatedcost of hedging our obligations under thenotes. Because hedging our