University of Wisconsin-Madison

19/08/2024 | News release | Distributed by Public on 19/08/2024 14:47

Trees stripped by invasive caterpillars muster defenses that can harm native insects

Rick Lindroth, entomology professor emeritus, and Patricia Fernandez, an ecologist and professor visiting on a Fulbright Fellowship from the University of Buenos Aires.

An invasive insect with an insatiable appetite can cause serious problems for a favorite native moth that likes the same food source - even though the two are never in direct competition for a meal, according to new research from University of Wisconsin-Madison ecologists.

Since the early 2000s, spongy moth caterpillars, an import from Europe, have flexed their gustatory muscle in Wisconsin by stripping entire stands of trees of their leaves during late spring and early summer in remarkably destructive feeding binges. While spongy moth outbreaks wax and wane, the caterpillars can show up in significant numbers, seemingly out of the blue.

That was the case in 2021 when Rick Lindroth, entomology professor emeritus, and members of his lab trekked into a research forest of quaking aspen trees Lindroth had planted in 2012 just a few miles from UW-Madison at the university's Arlington Agricultural Research Station. The team was excited to begin planned research after losing much of the 2020 field work season to the COVID pandemic.

Spongy moth caterpillars mass on a tree trunk. The voracious larvae of the invasive moth can completely denude trees of their leaves. Photo by Mark Zierden

"There were spongy moth egg masses everywhere!" Lindroth says. "We wanted to begin some experiments, but there were too many invasive insects to proceed. There was no way they could be removed. We thought we were sunk."

In a stroke of good fortune, Lindroth says, his lab had an extra pair of hands that summer: Patricia Fernandez, an ecologist and professor visiting on a Fulbright Fellowship from the University of Buenos Aires. Lindroth and Fernandez formulated a new research plan. They knew the spongy moth caterpillars were likely to chomp up every leaf on their trees, so why not study the aftermath?

One aspect of Lindroth's prior work had been exploring how different genetic and environmental factors shape the way plants defend themselves against attack. The researchers wondered whether an aspen tree's defenses - rallied against marauding, invasive spongy moth caterpillars - might do unusual harm to native species that have evolved to feed on trees with baseline levels of chemical protection.

"Any wild plant is defended against an array of herbivores via a number of mechanisms, and chemistry is one of the most important," Lindroth says. "Aspen trees - like their relatives, willow trees - produce a suite of salicylate-like compounds, close to aspirin, that act as toxins to protect the trees from many insects."

Because the spongy moth caterpillar ends its leaf-eating spree relatively early in the aspen tree's growing season, the defoliated trees produce a second flush of leaves to capture enough energy to survive (if not necessarily thrive) through the winter and into the next growth year. As expected, that second green canopy of leaves appeared by early July in Lindroth's forest plot. But the backup crop of leaves was different in at least one important aspect.

"Those trees had cranked up their defenses," Lindroth says. "By mid-summer, they produced an entirely new set of leaves that had, on average, an eight-times higher concentration of defense chemicals."

A stand of aspen trees is leafy on June 3, 2021, before an infestation of spongy moth caterpillars.

The stand of aspen is leafless by June 18, 2021, after the spongy moth caterpillars have eaten all the leaves.

The aspens' leaves have grown back again on July 18, 2021. However, research shows that those regrown leaves contain a much high concentration of defense chemicals than the original leaves.

By then, the spongy moth caterpillar culprits are pupating and changing into moths. But mid-summer is when caterpillars of the striking, native polyphemus moth - second largest moth in North America - are hatching and trying to fill their own rumbling stomachs.

In their lab, the researchers fed some polyphemus caterpillars leaves from the spongy-moth-infested plot and other polyphemus caterpillars leaves from a stand of aspen trees untouched by spongy moths (despite growing just 6 kilometers away).

Fully grown native polyphemus moths have wingspans of more than six inches, distinctive eye spots, and larvae with a taste for leaves of many of the same trees as spongy moth caterpillars. Photo by Rick Lindroth

Less than 18% of the native moth caterpillars fed on the high-toxin leaves left in the spongy moth's wake survived, while the polyphemus caterpillars fed from the undamaged trees were about four times as likely to survive to their next life stage.

"We're seeing an invasive species harm a native species - a cherished, charismatic, beautiful moth - by changing the quality of its food plant. Without the two ever meeting each other," Lindroth says. "That's where this study is unique. And it suggests defoliation from an invasive species could impact a whole community of other organisms via increases in toxic plant defenses. This research has identified yet another factor that may be contributing to the worldwide decline of insects."

The results, published today in the journal Ecology and Evolution, also suggest that in diverting resources to production of chemical defenses, the growth of trees is reduced relative to normal years. This in turn hampers the ability of forests to increase woody mass and sequester carbon in a way that mitigates climate change.

"Aspen is the most widely distributed tree species in North America," Lindroth says. "In every breath that you take, there are molecules of oxygen that were produced by aspen trees. It's a very important forest species, and to see the effect of an invasive insect ripple out into the forest community through changing the toxicity of the food landscape is astounding."

This research was supported by grants from U.S. Department of Agriculture (WIS03003 and 2016-67013-25088), the National Science Foundation (DEB-1456592) and a Fulbright Visiting Scholar Fellowship.