CPSC - U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission

30/07/2024 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 30/07/2024 11:50

CPSC Finds Amazon Responsible Under Federal Safety Law for Hazardous Products Sold by Third-Party Sellers on Amazon.com

Amazon Ordered to Develop Remediation Plans to Notify Purchasers and the Public and to Implement Remedies to Remove Products from Consumers' Homes

WASHINGTON, D.C. - The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) today issued a Decision and Orderagainst Amazon.com, Inc., a global e-commerce company with $575 billion in revenue. In a unanimous vote, the Commission determined that Amazon was a "distributor" of products that are defective or fail to meet federal consumer product safety standards, and therefore bears legal responsibility for their recall. More than 400,000 products are subject to this order: specifically, faulty carbon monoxide (CO) detectors, hairdryers without electrocution protection, and children's sleepwear that violated federal flammability standards.

The Commission determined that these products, listed on Amazon.com and sold by third-party sellers using the Fulfilled by Amazon program, pose a "substantial product hazard" under the Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA). Further, Amazon failed to notify the public about these hazardous products and did not take adequate steps to encourage its customers to return or destroy them, thereby leaving consumers at substantial risk of injury. Amazon argued before an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) and the Commission that it was not a distributor and bore no responsibility for the safety of the products sold under its Fulfilled by Amazon program.

Under the Commission's Decision and Order, Amazon must submit proposed plans to notify consumers and the public about the hazardous products, and to remove the products from commerce by incentivizing their return or destruction. The Commission will consider Amazon's proposed plans and address them in a second order in this case.

Overview

On July 14, 2021, the Commission authorized an administrative complaintagainst Amazon alleging that the company distributed certain products that pose a substantial product hazard. The matter was initially tried before an ALJ who ruled that Amazon was a "distributor," that the products present a substantial product hazard, and that Amazon must take certain steps, including issuing recalls, to protect the public from the hazardous products. Both parties appealed the ALJ's ruling to the Commission, which considered the record in the case and heard oral argument, resulting in this Decision and Order.

Under the CPSA, after the Commission hears evidence from the parties and determines that a product presents a substantial product hazard, it may require a manufacturer, distributor, or retailer of the product to warn consumers about the product risks and provide remedies to remove the products from consumers' homes and the marketplace.

When third-party sellers sell hazardous products through the platform or services of a distributor, the Commission may hold the distributor responsible for providing these remedies to consumers.

In this case, third-party sellers listed the hazardous products for sale on Amazon.com as part of the Fulfilled by Amazon program. In addition to allowing third-party sellers to list products on the Amazon.com website, this program provides an array of services to its participating sellers.

During the administrative law proceedings before the ALJ and the Commission, Amazon did not contest that the products present a substantial product hazard. Instead, Amazon argued that it was not acting as a distributor of the hazardous products within the meaning of the CPSA, and therefore was not responsible for taking actions to protect the public. The ALJ rejected Amazon's argument, holding that Amazon acted as a distributor in this matter. The Commission affirmed that holding in today's decision.

Amazon also claimed that sending messages to initial purchasers about "potential" safety issues and providing initial purchasers with Amazon.com credits - rather than refunds incentivizing product return or destruction - were sufficient to remedy the product hazards. The Commission, as well as the ALJ, disagreed, finding Amazon's actions inadequate to protect the public.

Amazon must now develop and submit proposed plans to notify purchasers and the public about the product hazards, and to provide refunds or replacements for these products. Notice to the public is important so that people who may have received one of the products as a gift or purchased it second-hand can learn about the hazards. The Commission will consider these plans and then issue a second order on notification and remedies.

Background Information

Media Contacts:
Pamela Springs - [email protected]; 301-504-7425
Nychelle Fleming - [email protected]; 301-504-7063