09/16/2024 | News release | Distributed by Public on 09/16/2024 07:17
With week one of US v. Google II in the books, let's take stock of where things stand, and what's to come.
For most of us (particularly those of us in the courtroom), last week's big moments are as much about revelation as validation. We learned what we all have suspected about all of the times Google definitively knew the perception, effect, and harms of their conduct, and did what they wanted to anyway, because they could.
The DOJ wove together a compelling narrative around the ways in which Google's abuse of dominance across their trifecta of monopolies left publishers with little choice, and even less control:
More detail can be found in my daily updates from the trial. But here are some key moments from last week, with receipts (aka Trial Exhibits).
Layser's testimony earlier in the week, as I wrote, contained the most poignant moment in the trial thus far about Google's unfair, unilateral decisions. Her testimony, and the below excerpts illuminate the two central themes of the trial: Google's control and their conflicts of interest.
More on conflicts from Eisar Lipkovitz's 2023 deposition:
The DOJ expects to wrap up their side sometime this coming week. This is about half of the three-week timeframe they originally anticipated for this trial. It also reflects the tight ship Judge Brinkema is running.
This week, we'll be hearing from a couple of expert witnesses, a few more industry participants, and at least four Google employees/Xooglers.
It is quite possible that Bellack will be the DOJ's closing act. That's because Bellack is a long-time employee that had been at DoubleClick since 2004, coming over to Google with the acquisition. He served in many product management-focused roles on the sell-side, including leading the unification of DFP and AdX under GAM. His name has appeared just about daily in emails and documents entered into evidence during the examinations of Xooglers like Eisar Lipkovitz, Brad Bender, and Rahul Srinivasan. (For more on each of these folks, check out our Witness Database.)
He appears unfettered by golden handcuffs, and isn't gagged by contract. But undoubtedly, there are personal loyalties that Bellack still holds. He thanks Neal Mohan (who testifies tomorrow), saying he "never stopped fighting" for him in his blog. Nevertheless, for the above reasons, and given that he seems to be the last Xoogler the DOJ plans to call, this is one I'm awaiting eagerly.
One of the interesting dynamics in the courtroom is how Google appears to be using one of their (many, many) defense team associates to run post-its back and forth to its comms team/spin-factory throughout the day. I've talked before about how control is Google's strategy. Controlling the narrative is a big part of this.
As I watch this play out each day, I am reminded of the critical importance of journalism and public access to information to a healthy market and functioning democracy - exactly what is at stake in this very trial. It is a reminder of why we and our partners created usvgoogleads.com and created resources there to help others do their own analysis and form their own opinions. The public silence the IAB and the ANA about this trial alone speaks volumes about the power Google wields.
It is a reminder each day of why I am incredibly proud to be here on the ground, and to have the opportunity to help keep you all informed. Let's keep all eyes on Google. The future of journalism depends on it.