12/03/2024 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 12/02/2024 23:48
In this working paper, the authors analyze how climate change reshapes natural resource hazards in the United States and assess the interplay of hazard exposure, social vulnerability, and drivers like climate and population changes over the next 50 years.
Date
Dec. 3, 2024
Authors
David N. Wear, Travis Warziniack, Claire O'Dea, and John Coulston
Publication
Working PaperReading time
1 minuteClimate change reshapes natural resource systems and results in increased likelihood of wildfire, water scarcity, and heat stress, along with other adverse outcomes that define potential harm across a broad spectrum of locales in the United States. We evaluate 50-year, multiple-scenario projections of resource hazards and population change from the USDA Forest Service 2020 Resources Planning Act Assessment to identify areas of concern based on hazard exposure and social vulnerability criteria and to evaluate implications for climate adaptation and risk mitigation planning. We project how and where hazard exposure may change over the next 50 years and decompose these changes into the portion driven by climate changes and the portion driven by population changes-both of which prove consequential. Water shortage projections show little change in spatial distribution but strong growth in the intensity of anticipated droughts. Wildfire projections show a structural change in pattern, with emergent growth in wildfire extent in the southeastern United States coincident with higher population densities and social vulnerability. High heat areas expand toward the North and East from the Southwest. Projections also show substantial growth in areas affected by two or more hazards and highlight where hazards correspond with high exposure or high vulnerability. For all hazard categories and scenarios, at least 80 percent of the population exposed to high hazard is in either a high-vulnerability or high-exposure county. Our results highlight how management strategies would differ between those focused on mitigating the biophysical hazard alone and those that focus on mitigating exposure or vulnerability criteria.
Travis Warziniack
Research Economist, US Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station
Claire O'Dea
National Program Leader, Resources Planning Act Assessment
John Coulston
Project Leader, US Forest Service
Resources Radio - Nov 26, 2024
Making Room for the River with Nature-Based Solutions, with Matt Chambers
City & State: "National Flood Insurance Program Likely to be Headache for Next President"
RFF Fellow Penny Liao reflects on the National Flood Insurance Program.