02/08/2024 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 03/08/2024 03:56
Director Nominee
|
Votes For
|
Votes Against
|
Abstentions
|
Broker Non-Votes
|
Richard H. Carmona, M.D.
|
102,889,690
|
1,301,134
|
226,747
|
10,430,364
|
Dominic J. Caruso
|
102,722,526
|
1,460,819
|
234,226
|
10,430,364
|
W. Roy Dunbar
|
96,615,390
|
7,469,486
|
332,695
|
10,430,364
|
Deborah Dunsire, M.D.
|
103,610,817
|
582,591
|
224,163
|
10,430,364
|
James H. Hinton
|
102,923,389
|
1,258,717
|
235,465
|
10,430,364
|
Donald R. Knauss
|
94,231,913
|
9,862,899
|
322,759
|
10,430,364
|
Bradley E. Lerman
|
102,939,946
|
1,235,297
|
242,328
|
10,430,364
|
Maria N. Martinez
|
94,460,082
|
9,735,942
|
221,547
|
10,430,364
|
Kevin M. Ozan
|
103,237,409
|
933,809
|
246,353
|
10,430,364
|
Brian S. Tyler
|
103,434,980
|
771,316
|
211,275
|
10,430,364
|
Kathleen Wilson-Thompson
|
98,325,321
|
5,868,018
|
224,232
|
10,430,364
|
Votes For
|
Votes Against
|
Abstentions
|
Broker Non-Votes
|
107,225,689
|
7,429,611
|
192,635
|
-
|
Votes For
|
Votes Against
|
Abstentions
|
Broker Non-Votes
|
93,564,597
|
10,051,796
|
801,178
|
10,430,364
|
Votes For
|
Votes Against
|
Abstentions
|
Broker Non-Votes
|
87,861,330
|
16,200,963
|
355,278
|
10,430,364
|
Votes For
|
Votes Against
|
Abstentions
|
Broker Non-Votes
|
25,199,445
|
78,587,552
|
630,574
|
10,430,364
|
Votes For
|
Votes Against
|
Abstentions
|
Broker Non-Votes
|
17,590,542
|
84,778,847
|
2,048,182
|
10,430,364
|
1
|
Under the Company's majority voting standard, the election of a nominee required that the nominee receive a majority of the votes cast (that is, the number of votes cast "for" each nominee had to exceed the number of votes cast "against" such nominee). Therefore, abstentions and broker non-votes were required to be disregarded and had no effect on the vote results.
|
2
|
Approval of each proposal with this footnote designation required the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of the shares present, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote on the proposal at the Annual Meeting. Therefore, abstentions, which represented shares present and entitled to vote, had the same effect as a vote against the proposal. Broker non-votes, if any, were required to be disregarded and had no effect on the vote results.
|
3
|
Approval of this proposal required the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares entitled to vote on the proposal. Therefore, abstentions and broker non-votes had the same effect as a vote against the proposal.
|