Quarterly Report for Quarter Ending July 31, 2024 (Form 10-Q)

4

5

6

7

SMITH & WESSON BRANDS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - (Continued)

(Unaudited)

8

SMITH & WESSON BRANDS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

For the Three Months Ended July 31, 2024 and 2023

(1) Organization:

We are one of the world's leading manufacturers and designers of firearms. We manufacture a wide array of handguns (including revolvers and pistols), long guns (including modern sporting rifles, pistol caliber carbines, and lever action rifles), handcuffs, firearm suppressors, and other firearm-related products for sale to a wide variety of customers, including firearm enthusiasts, collectors, hunters, sportsmen, competitive shooters, individuals desiring home and personal protection, law enforcement and security agencies and officers, and military agencies in the United States and throughout the world. We sell our products under the Smith & Wesson and Gemtech brands. We manufacture our products at our facilities in Springfield, Massachusetts; Houlton, Maine; Deep River, Connecticut;and Maryville, Tennessee. We also sell our manufacturing services to other businesses to attempt to level-load our factories. We sell those services under our Smith & Wesson and Smith & Wesson Precision Components brands. During fiscal 2024, we began manufacturing and distribution activities from our new Maryville facility. See Note 9 - Commitments and Contingencies and Note 10 - Restructuringfor more information.

(2) Basis of Presentation:

(3) Leases:

We lease certain of our real estate, machinery, equipment, and photocopiers under non-cancelable operating and finance lease agreements.

We recognize expenses for our operating lease assets and liabilities at the commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. Our leases do not provide an implicit interest rate. We use our incremental borrowing rate based on the

information available at the lease commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments. Our lease agreements do not require material variable lease payments or residual value guarantees, nor do they include restrictive covenants. For operating leases, we recognize expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Tenant improvement allowances are recorded as an offsetting adjustment included in our calculation of the respective right-of-use asset.

Many of our leases include renewal options that enable us to extend the lease term. The execution of those renewal options is at our sole discretion and renewals are reflected in the lease term when they are reasonably certain to be exercised. The depreciable life of assets and leasehold improvements are limited by the expected lease term.

During the three months ended July 31, 2024, we recorded $324,000of operating lease costs. We recorded $566,000of finance lease amortization and $461,000of financing lease interest expense for the three months ended July 31, 2024. As of July 31, 2024, our weighted average lease term and weighted average discount rate for our operating leases was 2.2years and 4.5%, respectively. As of July 31, 2024, our weighted average lease term and weighted average discount rate for our financing leases were 14.1years and 5.0%, respectively, and consisted primarily of the facility in Missouri from which we previously operated a distribution center, or the Missouri Distribution Center. The building associated with the Missouri Distribution Center is pledged to secure the amounts outstanding. The depreciable lives of right-of-use assets are limited by the lease term and are amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the lease.

On October 26, 2017, we entered into (a) a lease agreement with Ryan Boone County, LLC, or the Original Missouri Landlord, concerning certain real property located in Boone County, Missouri on which we had, until recently, been operating the Missouri Distribution Center, or the Missouri Lease, and (b) a guaranty in favor of the Original Missouri Landlord, or the Guaranty. With the completion of the spin-off of our outdoor products and accessories business on August 24, 2020, or the Separation, we entered into a sublease whereby American Outdoor Brands, Inc., our former wholly owned subsidiary, or AOUT, subleased from us 59.0% of the Missouri Distribution Center under the same terms as the Missouri Lease, or the Missouri Sublease. On July 16, 2022, we entered into an amendment to the Missouri Sublease, increasing the leased space to 64.7% of the Missouri Distribution Center under the same terms as the Missouri Lease. On January 31, 2023, we entered into (i) an assignment and assumption agreement with AOUT, or the Assignment and Assumption Agreement, pursuant to which, on January 1, 2024 AOUT assumed all of our rights, entitlement, and obligations in, to, and under the Missouri Lease, and (ii) an amended and restated guaranty in favor of RCS-S&W Facility, LLC, as successor in interest to the Original Missouri Landlord, pursuant to which Smith & Wesson Sales Company was added as a guarantor, or the Amended and Restated Guaranty. We terminated the Missouri Sublease as of January 1, 2024. During the three months ended July 31, 2024, the finance lease liability relating to the Missouri Lease was reduced by $366,000as a result of payments made by AOUT directly to the landlord. During the three months ended July 31, 2024, we recognized $878,000of related income, of which $424,000was recorded in general and administrative expenses and $454,000was recorded in interest expense, net, in our condensed consolidated statements of operations.

On January 5, 2024, we entered into an amendment to the lease for our Deep River facility, pursuant to which we extended its term from May 4, 2024 to January 4, 2025. We intend to occupy the facility at least through the amended lease termination date. We do not currently believe there are any indications of impairment relating to assets being utilized at the Deep River facility.

During the three months ended July 31, 2024, the cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of liabilities and operating cash flows was $393,000.

(4) Notes and Loans Payable:

Credit Facilities- On August 24, 2020, we and certain of our subsidiaries entered into an amended and restated credit agreement, or the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, with certain lenders, including TD Bank, N.A., as administrative agent; TD Securities (USA) LLC and Regions Bank, as joint lead arrangers and joint bookrunners; and Regions Bank, as syndication agent. The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement is currently unsecured; however, should any Springing Lien Trigger Event (as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement) occur, we and certain of our subsidiaries would be required to execute certain documents in favor of TD Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, and the lenders party to such documents would have a legal, valid, and enforceable ‎first priority lien on the collateral described therein.

The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement provides for a revolving line of credit of $100.0million at any one time, or the Revolving Line. The Revolving Line bears interest at either the Base Rate (as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement) or the SOFR rate, plus an applicable margin based on our consolidated leverage ratio.The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement also provides a swingline facility in the maximum amount of $5.0million at any one time (subject to availability under the Revolving Line). Each Swingline Loan (as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement) bears interest at the Base Rate, plus an applicable margin based on our Adjusted Consolidated Leverage Ratio (as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement).Subject to the satisfaction of certain terms and conditions described in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, we have an option to increase the Revolving Line by an aggregate amount not exceeding $50.0million. The Revolving Line matures on the earlier of

August 24, 2025or the date that is six months in advance of the earliest maturity of any Permitted Notes (as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement) under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. On April 28, 2023, we entered into an amendment to our existing credit agreement to, among other things, replace LIBOR with SOFR as the interest rate benchmark and amend the definition of "Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio" to exclude unfinanced capital expenditures in connection with the Relocation.

As of July 31, 2024, we had $70.0million of borrowings outstanding on the Revolving Line, bearing interest at an average rate of 7.19%, which is equal to the SOFR rate plus an applicable margin.

The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement contains customary limitations, including limitations on indebtedness, liens, fundamental changes to business or organizational structure, investments, loans, advances, guarantees, and acquisitions, asset sales, dividends, stock repurchases, stock redemptions, and the redemption or prepayment of other debt, and transactions with affiliates. We are also subject to financial covenants, including a minimum consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio and a maximum consolidated leverage ratio. As of July 31, 2024, we were compliant with all required financial covenants.

Letters of Credit- At July 31, 2024, we had outstanding letters of credit aggregating $2.7million, which included a $1.5 million letter of credit to collateralize our captive insurance company.

(5) Fair Value Measurement:

We follow the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic, or ASC 820-10, for our financial assets and liabilities. ASC 820-10 provides a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP and requires expanded disclosures regarding fair value measurements. ASC 820-10 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820-10 also establishes a fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs, where available, and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.

Financial assets and liabilities recorded on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets are categorized based on the inputs to the valuation techniques as follows:

Level 1- Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market that we have the ability to access at the measurement date (e.g., active exchange-traded equity securities, listed derivatives, and most U.S. Government and agency securities).

Our cash and cash equivalents, which are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, totaled $35.5million and $60.8million as of July 31, 2024 and April 30, 2024, respectively. The carrying value of our revolving line of credit approximated the fair value as of July 31, 2024. We utilized Level 1 of the value hierarchy to determine the fair values of these assets.

Level 2- Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on quoted prices in markets in which trading occurs infrequently or whose values are based on quoted prices of instruments with similar attributes in active markets. Level 2 inputs include the following:

Level 3- Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. These inputs reflect our judgments about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability.

We did not have any Level 2 or Level 3 financial assets or liabilities as of July 31, 2024.

12

SMITH & WESSON BRANDS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

For the Three Months Ended July 31, 2024 and 2023

(6) Inventories:

(7) Accrued Expenses and Deferred Revenue:

(8) Stockholders' Equity:

Treasury Stock

On September 19, 2023, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $50.0million of our common stock, subject to certain conditions, in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions through September 19, 2024. During fiscal 2024, we purchased 793,551shares of our common stock for $10.2million under this authorization. Through the three months ended July 31, 2024, we repurchased 870,669shares of our common stock for$12.9million under this authorization. There were nocommon stock purchases through the three months ended July 31, 2023, nor were there any unfulfilled authorizations. On September 5, 2024, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $50.0million of our common stock, subject to certain conditions, in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions from September 20, 2024 through September 20, 2025.

Earnings per Share

For the three months ended July 31, 2024, there were noshares excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share as a result of the net loss for the period. For the three months ended July 31, 2023, there were 12,167shares excluded from the computation of diluted earnings because the effect would be antidilutive.

Incentive Stock and Employee Stock Purchase Plans

We have two stock incentive plans: the 2013 Incentive Stock Plan and the 2022 Incentive Stock Plan, or the Incentive Stock Plans, under which employees and non-employees may be granted stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, bonus stock and awards in lieu of obligations, performance awards, and dividend equivalents. No grants have been made under the 2013 Incentive Stock Plan since our stockholders approved the 2022 Incentive Stock Plan at our annual meeting of stockholders held in September 2022. All new grants are issued under the 2022 Incentive Stock Plan.

We have an Employee Stock Purchase Plan, or the ESPP, under which each participant is granted an option to purchase our common stock at a discount on each subsequent exercise date during the offering period (as such terms are defined in the ESPP) in accordance with the terms of the ESPP.

The total stock-based compensation expense, including purchases under our ESPP and grants of RSUs and performance-based RSUs, or PSUs, under the Incentive Stock Plans, was $1.9 million and $1.3million for the three months ended July 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. We include stock-based compensation expense in cost of sales, sales, marketing, and distribution, research and development, and general and administrative expenses.

We grant RSUs to employees and non-employee members of our Board of Directors. The awards are made at no cost to the recipient. An RSU represents the right to receive one share of our common stock and does not carry voting or dividend rights. Except in specific circumstances, RSU grants to employees vest over a period of four yearswith one-fourthof the units vesting on each anniversary of the grant date. We amortize the aggregate fair value of our RSU grants to compensation expense over the vesting period.

We grant PSUs to our executive officers and, from time to time, certain management employees who are not executive officers. The PSUs vest, and the fair value of such PSUs will be recognized, over the corresponding three-yearperformance period.

During the three months ended July 31, 2024, we granted an aggregate of 400,819RSUs, including 257,937RSUs to non-executive officer employees and 142,882RSUs to our executive officers. During the three months ended July 31, 2024, we granted 142,878PSUs to certain of our executive officers. During the three months ended July 31, 2024, we cancelled 63,469PSUs as a result of the failure to satisfy the performancemetrics and 10,575RSUs as a result of the service conditions not being met. In connection with the vesting of RSUs, during the three months ended July 31, 2024, we delivered common stock to our employees (including our executive officers), former employees, and directors, with a total market value of $3.6million.

During the three months ended July 31, 2023, we granted an aggregate of 301,483RSUs, including 175,916RSUs to non-executive officer employees, 117,724RSUs to our executive officers, and 7,843RSUs to a new director. During the three months ended July 31, 2023, we granted 176,583PSUs to certain of our executive officers. During the three months ended July 31, 2023, we cancelled 158,100PSUs as a result of the failure to satisfy the performancemetric and 5,420RSUs as a result of the service conditions not being met. In connection with the vesting of RSUs, during the three months ended July 31, 2023, we delivered common stock to our employees (including our executive officers), former employees, and directors, with a total market value of $2.0million. In connection with a 2019 grant, which vested in fiscal 2023, we delivered market-condition PSUs to certain of our executive officers and a former executive officer with a total market value of $664,000.

As of July 31, 2024, there was $8.9million of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested RSUs and PSUs. This expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted average remaining contractual term of 1.9years.

(9) Commitments and Contingencies:

Litigation

In January 2018, Gemini Technologies, Incorporated, or Gemini, commenced an action against us in the U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho, or the District Court. The complaint alleges, among other things, that we breached the earn-out and other provisions of the asset purchase agreement and ancillary agreements between the parties in connection with our acquisition of the Gemtech business from Gemini. The complaint seeks a declaratory judgment interpreting various terms of the asset purchase agreement and damages in the sum of $18.6million. In November 2019, we filed an answer to Gemini's complaint and a counterclaim against Gemini and its stockholders at the time of the signing of the asset purchase agreement. Plaintiffs amended their complaint to add a claim of fraud in the inducement. In September 2021, Gemini filed a motion for summary judgment seeking to dismiss our counterclaim. In June 2022, the District Court denied Gemini's motion for summary judgment. Gemini filed a second motion for summary judgment, and in August 2023, the District Court again denied Gemini's motion. In November 2023, we entered into a settlement agreement with plaintiffs on the indemnity and counterclaims. On the same day, plaintiffs filed a motion for leave, seeking to file a second amended complaint. On January 31, 2024, the District Court allowed plaintiffs' amended allegations of fraud, and denied without prejudice their motion to add punitive damages. On February 9, 2024, the District Court set a trial date for January 6, 2025. On August 7, 2024, the District Court issued a 45-day stay of the case and vacated the January 6, 2025 trial date. We believe the claims asserted in the complaint have no merit, and we intend to aggressively defend this action.

We are a defendant in threeproduct liability cases and are aware of eightother product liability claims, primarily alleging defective product design, defective manufacturing, or failure to provide adequate warnings. In addition, we are a co-defendant in a case filed in August 1999 by the city of Gary, Indiana, or the City, against numerous firearm manufacturers, distributors, and dealers seeking to recover monetary damages, as well as injunctive relief, allegedly arising out of the misuse of firearms by third parties. In January 2018, the Lake Superior Court, County of Lake, Indiana granted defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, dismissing the case in its entirety. In February 2018, plaintiffs appealed the dismissal to the Indiana Court of Appeals. In May 2019, the Indiana Court of Appeals issued a decision, which affirmed in part and reversed in part, and remanded for further proceedings, the trial court's dismissal of the City's complaint. In July 2019, defendants filed a Petition to Transfer jurisdiction to the Indiana Supreme Court. In November 2019, the Indiana Supreme Court denied defendants' petition to transfer, and the case was returned to the trial court. Discovery is ongoing. On March 15, 2024, IC 34-12-3.5 was signed into law. This law purported to prohibit political subdivisions in Indiana from bringing certain legal actions against certain firearm industry members and to apply to actions or suits filed before, after, or on August 27, 1999. On March 18, 2024, defendants filed a joint motion for judgment on the pleadings based on the new law. On May 17, 2024, plaintiffs filed an opposition to defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings. On August 12, 2024, the trial court denied defendants' joint motion for judgment on the pleadings. We believe the claims asserted in the complaint are without merit and intend to aggressively defend this action.

We are a defendant in a putative class proceeding before the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Toronto, Canada that was filed in December 2019. The action claims CAD$50million in aggregate general damages, CAD$100million in aggregate punitive damages, special damages in an unspecified amount, together with interest and legal costs. The named plaintiffs are twovictims of a shooting that took place in Toronto in July 2018 and their family members. One victim was shot and injured during the shooting. The other victim suffered unspecified injuries while fleeing the shooting. The plaintiffs sought to certify a claim on behalf of classes that include all persons who were killed or injured in the shooting and their immediate family members. The plaintiffs allege negligent design and public nuisance. The case has not been certified as a class action. In July 2020, we filed a Notice of Motion for an order striking the claim and dismissing the action in its entirety. In February 2021, the court granted our motion in part, and dismissed the plaintiffs' claims in public nuisance and strict liability. The court declined to strike the negligent design claim and ordered that the claim proceed to a certification motion. In March 2021, we filed a motion for leave to appeal the court's refusal to strike the negligent design claim with the Divisional Court, Ontario Superior Court of Justice. In July 2021, plaintiffs filed a motion to stay our motion for leave to appeal with the Divisional Court, on grounds that appeal is premature. In November 2021, the Divisional Court granted plaintiffs' motion, staying our motion for leave to appeal until 30 days after the decision on the balance of plaintiffs' certification motion. A hearing on plaintiffs' certification motion was held in January 2024. On March 5, 2024, the court denied the plaintiffs' motion for class certification. Three appeals have been filed, all of which will be heard together in the Court of Appeal for Ontario: (1) our appeal from the dismissal of our motion to strike the negligent design claim; (2) the plaintiffs' appeal from the order striking out their public nuisance and strict liability claims; and, (3) the plaintiffs' appeal from the order dismissing their certification motion. On August 6, 2024, we filed our motion regarding our appeal from the dismissal of our motion to strike the negligent design claim and plaintiffs filed their motion regarding their appeal from the order striking out their public nuisance and strict liability claims and their appeal from the order dismissing their certification motion.

In May 2020, we were named in an action related to the Chabad of Poway synagogue shooting that took place in April 2019. The complaint was filed in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Diego - Central, and asserts claims against us for product liability, unfair competition, negligence, and public nuisance. The plaintiffs allege they were present at the synagogue on the day of the incident and suffered physical and/or emotional injury. The plaintiffs seek compensatory and punitive damages, attorneys' fees, and injunctive relief. In September 2020, we filed a demurrer and motion to strike, seeking to dismiss plaintiffs' complaint. In July 2021, the court granted our motion in part, and reversed it in part, ruling that (1) the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act barred plaintiffs' product liability action; (2) plaintiffs did not have standing to maintain an action under the Unfair Competition Law for personal injury related damages, but gave plaintiffs leave to amend to plead an economic injury; and (3) the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act did not bar plaintiffs' ordinary negligence and public nuisance actions because plaintiffs had alleged that we violated 18 U.S.C. Section 922(b)(4), which generally prohibits the sale of fully automatic "machineguns." In August 2021, we filed a Petition for Writ of Mandate in the Court of Appeal of the State of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division One. In September 2021, the Court of Appeal denied our appeal. In February 2022, the court consolidated the case with three related cases, in which we are not a party. In March 2022, the court granted our motion, dismissing plaintiffs' Unfair Competition Law claim, without further leave to amend. Discovery is ongoing. On February 28, 2023, we filed a motion for summary judgment. On May 19, 2023, the court denied our motion for summary judgment without prejudice and allowed plaintiffs time for additional, limited discovery. A hearing on our renewed motion for summary judgment was held on August 16, 2024. Trial is scheduled for January 24, 2025.

We are a defendant in an action filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts. In August 2021, the Mexican Government filed an action against several U.S.-based firearms manufacturers and a firearms distributor, claiming defendants design, market, distribute, and sell firearms in ways they know routinely arm the drug cartels in Mexico. Plaintiff alleges, among other claims, negligence, public nuisance, design defect, unjust enrichment and restitution against all defendants and violation of the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act against us alone, and is seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief. In November 2021, defendants filed motions to dismiss plaintiff's complaint. In September 2022, the district court granted defendants' motions to dismiss. In October 2022, plaintiff filed a notice of appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. On January 22, 2024, the First Circuit reversed the trial court's dismissal of the case. On April 18, 2024, defendants filed a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari with the Supreme Court of the United States. A conference is scheduled before the U.S. Supreme Court on September 30, 2024. On August 7, 2024, the district court dismissed the case against six of the eight defendants in the suit excluding us based on personal jurisdiction grounds. The district court has scheduled a status conference for October 2, 2024.

In September 2022, we were named as defendants in 12 nearly identical, separate actions related to a shooting in Highland Park, Illinois on July 4, 2022. The complaints were filed in the Circuit Court of the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit in Lake County, Illinois and assert claims against us for negligence and deceptive and unfair practices under the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act. The plaintiffs allege they were present at a parade at the time of the incident and suffered physical and/or emotional injury. The plaintiffs seek compensatory damages, attorneys' fees, and injunctive relief. We filed motions for removal of each case to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. In November 2022, we filed a motion to consolidate the cases for preliminary motion purposes. In December 2022, plaintiffs filed motions to remand the cases back to the state court. In September 2023, the court granted

plaintiffs' motion to remand. In October 2023, we filed a notice of appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. In March 2024, three new suits were filed in the Circuit Court of Lake County, Illinois. On April 8, 2024, the Seventh Circuit affirmed the remand decision. On May 10, 2024, plaintiffs filed a motion for attorneys' fees incurred as a result of removal. On May 17, 2024, we filed an opposition to plaintiffs' motion. No decision has been issued to date. In June and July 2024, the district court remanded the 12 separate actions to state court, with some plaintiffs amending their complaints to remove references to violations of federal law and asserting an additional claim against us for deceptive and unfair practices under the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act. We were also named in 13 additional separate cases against us in the same state court during the same time period, largely raising similar allegations against us as in the initial and amended complaints.

In December 2022, the City of Buffalo, New York filed a complaint in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Erie, against numerous manufacturers, distributors, and retailers of firearms. Later in December 2022, the City of Rochester, New York filed an almost identical complaint in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Monroe, against the same defendants. The complaints allege violation of New York General Business Law, public nuisance, and deceptive business practices in violation of NY General Business Laws. In January 2023, we filed notices of removal of the cases to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York. On March 24, 2023, defendants filed a motion to stay both cases pending a ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in the NSSF v. James case. On June 8, 2023, the court granted defendants' motions to consolidate and to stay pending resolution of the NSSF v. James appeal.

We believe that the various allegations as described above are unfounded, and, in addition, that any incident and any results from them or any injuries were due to negligence or misuse of the firearm by the claimant or a third party.

In March 2022, two plaintiffs, on behalf of a proposed class of current and former employees and temporary workers who worked at our Springfield facility from November 2018 to the present, filed a claim alleging non-payment of wages and overtime in violation of the Massachusetts Wage Act and Massachusetts Fair Wage Act. The parties have reached a settlement agreement, which was preliminarily approved by the court on March 15, 2024. A hearing seeking final approval of the settlement is scheduled for September 17, 2024.

In addition, from time to time, we are involved in lawsuits, claims, investigations, and proceedings, including commercial, environmental, premises and employment matters, which arise in the ordinary course of business.

The relief sought in individual cases primarily includes compensatory and, sometimes, punitive damages. Certain of the cases and claims seek unspecified compensatory or punitive damages. In others, compensatory damages sought may range from less than $75,000to approximately $50.0million. In our experience, initial demands do not generally bear a reasonable relationship to the facts and circumstances of a particular matter. We believe that our accruals for product liability cases and claims are a reasonable quantitative measure of the cost to us of product liability cases and claims.

We were also involved in a putative stockholder derivative lawsuit filed on December 5, 2023 in the Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County, Nevada. The action was brought by plaintiffs seeking to act on our behalf against our directors and certain of our executive officers. The complaint alleged breach of fiduciary duties by knowingly allowing us to become exposed to significant liability for intentionally violating federal, state, and local laws through our manufacturing, marketing, and sale of "AR-15 style rifles." The derivative plaintiffs sought damages on our behalf from the individual defendants, as well as reforms and improvements to our compliance procedures and governance policies. On March 19, 2024, the court granted our motion to require security pursuant to Nevada law. On May 6, 2024, the court dismissed plaintiffs' action without prejudice for failing to post a bond pursuant to the court's order. On June 28, 2024, plaintiffs filed a motion to retax costs, arguing that we are not entitled to costs based on the court's order of dismissal. On July 9, 2024, we filed a motion for attorneys' fees and costs. On July 10 and 11, 2024, plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal of the order of dismissal without prejudice and case appeal statement, respectively. On July 25, 2024, plaintiffs filed a notice of posting of bond on appeal. On August 9, 2024, we filed an opposition to plaintiffs' motion to retax costs.

We are vigorously defending ourselves in the lawsuits to which we are subject. An unfavorable outcome or prolonged litigation could harm our business. Litigation of this nature also is expensive, time consuming, and diverts the time and attention of our management.

We monitor the status of known claims and the related product liability accrual, which includes amounts for defense costs for asserted and unasserted claims. After consultation with litigation counsel and a review of the merit of each claim, we have concluded that we are unable to reasonably estimate the probability or the estimated range of reasonably possible losses related to material adverse judgments related to such claims and, therefore, we have not accrued for any such judgments. In the future, should we determine that a loss (or an additional loss in excess of our accrual) is at least reasonably possible and material, we would then disclose an estimate of

the possible loss or range of loss, if such estimate could be made, or disclose that an estimate could not be made. We believe that we have provided adequate accruals for defense costs.

At this time, an estimated range of reasonably possible additional losses relating to unfavorable outcomes cannot be made.

Commitments

On September 30, 2021, we announced our plan to move our headquarters and significant elements of our operations to Maryville, Tennessee in 2023, or the Relocation. In connection with the Relocation, we entered into a project agreement, or the Project Agreement, with The Industrial Development Board of Blount County and the cities of Alcoa and Maryville, Tennessee, a public, nonprofit corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of Tennessee, or the IDB. Pursuant to the Project Agreement, we represented to the IDB that we intend to incur, or cause to be incurred, no less than $120.0 million in aggregate capital expenditures on or before December 31, 2025, create no less than 620 new jobs, and sustain an average hourly wage of at least $25.97at the facility. Further, pursuant to the Project Agreement, we are required to, among other things, (A) execute a facility lease and an equipment lease with the IDB; (B) cause the construction of the new facility at our sole cost and expense to commence on or before May 31, 2022; (C) incur, or cause to be incurred, aggregate capital expenditures in connection with the construction and equipping of the new facility in an aggregate amount of not less than $120.0million on or before December 31, 2025; (D) cause the construction of the new facility to be substantially completed and for a certificate of occupancy to be issued therefore on or before December 31, 2023; (E) provide the IDB with a written report certified by one of our authorized officers, not later than January 31 of each year during the period between January 31, 2024 and January 31, 2031; and (F) make certain payments to IDB in the event that our actual capital expenditures, number of employees, or average hourly wage of such employees are less than our projections.

On February 2, 2023, we entered into a design-build agreement with The Christman Company, or Christman, related to the construction of our Maryville facility, or the Construction Contract. The Construction Contract has an effective date of September 13, 2021 and incorporates the arrangements under which we and Christman have been proceeding. Pursuant to the Construction Contract, Christman is obligated to deliver certain services, including, among others, design phase services and construction phase services, and we are obligated to pay Christman for services performed. The parties to the Construction Contract agreed that Christman will perform and complete the Work (as defined therein) on a cost-plus basis for a guaranteed maximum price of $114.5million, including contingencies. When adding the cost of machinery and equipment, we expect to spend between $160.0million and $170.0million through the end of fiscal 2025. Through July 31, 2024, we had incurred $157.0 million of capital expenditures related to the Relocation. The Construction Contract includes terms that are customary for contracts of this type, including with respect to indemnification and insurance. The Construction Contract lists certain contract milestones and guaranteed completion dates, and we will be entitled to liquidated damages under certain circumstances. Each party to the Construction Contract is entitled to terminate the Construction Contract under certain circumstances.

During the quarter ended July 31, 2023, we determined that we would have no use for certain distribution equipment in our Missouri Distribution Center and could not fully recover the net book value of such equipment. Therefore, we recorded an impairment of $2.0million during that quarter. In connection with the Assignment and Assumption Agreement, we vacated the Missouri Distribution Center effective January 1, 2024 and sold assets we could no longer utilize to AOUT at their remaining net book value of $2.9million, relocating all remaining assets to our Maryville facility.

In addition, we relocated a portion of our plastic injection molding operations to the Maryville facility. As of July 31, 2024, the plastic injection molding machinery and equipment was being utilized in our Deep River facility, had been relocated to the Maryville facility, or had been disposed. We do not believe there are any indications of impairment relating to assets being utilized at the Deep River facility.

(10) Restructuring:

As a result of the Relocation, $1.3million and $3.9million of net restructuring charges were recorded in the three months ended July 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26