States, Members of Congress, Former Agency & CEQ Officials, Legal Experts, Local Communities File Amicus Briefs in Defense of NEPA in Supreme Court Oil Train Case

States, Members of Congress, Former Agency & CEQ Officials, Legal Experts, Local Communities File Amicus Briefs in Defense of NEPA in Supreme Court Oil Train Case

Numerous groups in support of environmental and public health groups

Contacts

Jackson Chiappinelli, (585) 402-2005, [email protected]

Numerous groups filed amicus briefs before the U.S. Supreme Court in support of environmental and public health groups in Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, which concerns the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The amici include:

• A group of statesled by Colorado
• Former high-ranking officials of federal agenciesthat make, build, and implement federal projects
• The Howard Law School Civil Rights Clinic, discussing how NEPA gives groups like environmental justice and tribal communities a voice in federal planning
• Legal scholarsfrom the Institute for Policy Integrity at New York University Law School
• Members of Congress, led by Representative Raúl Grijalva and Senator Ed Markey, who have and will continue to exercise their constitutional authority to shape NEPA as needed to respond to policy debates
• Local Colorado communitiesthat would face harm from Uinta Basin waxy crude trains as they traverse the Rocky Mountains on the way to the Gulf. Among these groups is the Northwest Colorado Council of Governments, an association representing local governments from across the political spectrum
• Former White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) officialsincluding those who have worked for five Republican and two Democratic Presidents. They argue that the Railway's interpretation of NEPA conflicts with the understanding they developed of the law based on their long experience with it.
• The Constitutional Accountability Center, addressing the value of adhering to longstanding understandings of federal statutes as the Court itself has emphasized

The amici represent broad and varied interests that will help the Supreme Court understand the legal and practical consequences of undoing the ruling below, which required the Surface Transportation Board to consider important environmental effects before approving an 88-mile railway that would transport waxy crude oil from the Uinta Basin in northeastern Utah through the Colorado Rockies to Gulf Coast refineries. The case considers the scope of NEPA.

This month, environmental and public health groups filed a briefwith the Supreme Court. The Court will hear arguments on the case on Tuesday, Dec. 10.

Additional Resources

• About the Washington, D.C. Office

About Earthjustice

Earthjustice is the premier nonprofit environmental law organization. We wield the power of law and the strength of partnership to protect people's health, to preserve magnificent places and wildlife, to advance clean energy, and to combat climate change. We are here because the earth needs a good lawyer.